SFWoW

San Francisco Women on the Web: serve, educate, empower

July 24, 2008

From the List: Recommended Web Designers

Filed under: community, open source, technology — anna @ 10:46 am

A friend called me the other day to ask urgently, did I know a dependable, quick web designer for some clients of his? “I used to know a lot, but now I don’t even know where to find one!” he said. Well, I posted to the list asking that question- and received this great list. Please contact me to get added.

Lisa LaTorre
www.llatorre.com
llatorre@inmotionmedia.net

Kimberley Kradel
webdev.kimba.com
kimba@kimba.com

Cate Calson
www.calsongraphics.com
cc@calsongraphics.com

Julia Satovsky
julia@j4design.com
www.j4design.com

Joe Crawford
www.artlung.com
joe@artlung.com

Estelle W.
estelle@weyl.org
evotech.net/blog

Lorene Anderson
webby12342001@yahoo.com
web.LoreneAnderson.com

Janet Fouts
Tatu Digital Media
fouts@tatudigital.com
www.tatudigital.com

Jennifer Melnick Bar-Nahum
Olio Arts
www.olioarts.com
melnick@olioarts.com

July 25, 2007

Wowzers on WordCamp 2007

Filed under: community, open source, technology — anna @ 4:14 pm

WordCamp T-ShirtWowzers made it out from the far corners of San Francisco to attend this year’s WordPress conference- WordCamp 2007- held at my people’s hall- Swedish American Hall. I showed up for the last 3 talks, but others were there earlier and longer. I asked a few Wowzers the following questions. Eleanor (EB) Robyn Tippins (RT), and myself, Anna (AB).

  1. Do you like barbecue?
    • EB: I can count on one hand the times I have had it - so it was a nice alternative.
    • RT: Um… yes :)
    • AB: I missed the brisket. Guess I counted on there being leftovers. This time, there were boxes and boxes of water, which, in a pinch, I would prefer.
  2. How long have you been in wordpress, what version do you have?
    • EB: My blogs are completely hosted by WordPress - use the template and
      the domain name. First started Oct 2006.
    • RT: I’ve been a user since Dec of 05, when I took my Blogger blog and placed it there. I have not yet upgraded to 2.0 on my main blog, but I have several blogs and each are running diff versions (naughty girl LOL).
    • AB: I got started last year, it was still in the 1.X versions. I took my blogger blog, moved it to my old HTML-style website, and ended up incorporating some applications (haiku database) into WordPress- that was my ultimate hack, and it totally worked! Now I’m on 2.0 but need to upgrade.
  3. Why do you prefer WordPress?
    • EB: I don’t come from the “tech”/web world, and this was my first foray into it Did a lot of research, checking out blogs and I liked the ones on WordPress - also my first blog is a sound blog, and so I had to consider what would be the best way of presenting audio…at the time (Oct 2006) WordPress had a relationship with Odeo, and it was very easy for me to just plop into that system.
      Let me say that Wordpress makes it very easy for initial blogmakers. I am not a programmer or developer, and my attention is limited in terms of exploring add-ons, widgets, and so forth. I want an easy way to present straightforward content.
    • RT: I love the fact that WordPress is simple to install, simple to use and has so many plugins and themes readily available. Akismet is also a favorite of mine. It just can’t be beat.
    • AB: I’m part of an MU on Movable Type, so that’s my only real comparison. I love WP because - for the author’s interface, it reads from a database it’s far faster responding time. I also like to adjust and tweak the sidebars and add widgets, mess with the stylesheets, and all that is much more approachable in WordPress. Also very easy to install. The admin UI is also great.
  4. Best widget/plug-in?
    • RT: Adsense Deluxe is my current favorite. It allows you to place adsense within a post and is the only way, I’ve seen, to use Google referral products within the text of a post (which is much more natural).
    • AB: I do love Akismet. I am kind of addicted to SnapIt, the little pop-up preview of where a link will go. I know that “recent comments” and the Flickr RSS feed on my sidebar probably had the biggest impact, as widgets go. I haven’t put in Ultimate Tag Warrior though I’ve been hearing about it forever.
  5. Biggest annoyance with the UI
    • RT: For the longest time if you were using the Rich Text editor, YouTube videos (or any video, for that matter) could not be embedded. That is fixed in 2.0 because it’s very easy to flip back and to between code and Rich Text editor. As well, the silly decision to make all uploaded images a thumbnail is really annoying. However, it is a small price to pay for such great software. No one is going to like everything, I suppose…
    • EB: One of Liz’s comments was that as she was interviewing people, some asked her what needed to be fixed….(ie - does it need to be fixed?) Since I am not yet a power user, I don’t yet have need for some of the sophisticated aspects of the UI.
    • AB: Even in 2.0 the rich text toggle annoys me. When I install it I have to make sure to set the setting off. Also, the thumbnail image being the default, and pasting into my image code. I too was annoyed with the way youtube tags rendered, and ended up switching from youtube (with original content) to Vidavee. But in all those are little things- the ease of installation and the open architecture is great. Also so much faster, as an author, than Moveable Type.
  6. Favorite bit of the talk geek-wise (what was new to you, what you learned, etc.)
    • RT: I enjoyed Jeremy Wright’s talk as his focus was on serving your readers and not your pocketbook, but Lorelle was amazing as well. As always though, my fav part was the Tshirt ;)
    • EB: Wordcamp seemed to do a very good job of presenting to an audience which ranged from the neophyte to the professional tekkie. Favorites: Matt Cutts SEO tips…JohnDvorak and Om Malik (I know their names, and hearing them in person was great - a lot of wisdom, smarts, and a lot of laughing from the audience)….Liz Danzico, Hyper cog.
      Lorelle is a natural performer - and she did bring up some pretty basic and useful thoughts.
      For me, the information kinda prods me to take my blogs to the next level. To think about broader effectiveness .
    • AB: I liked hearing, during the developer talk, where they wanted to go with it, and what their favorite aspects of the software were. I feel, after a year, that there can be a lot of improvements, so it’s ncie to know the vision and general direction.
    • EB: One of Liz’s comments was that as she was interviewing people, some
      asked her what needed to be fixed….(ie - does it need to be fixed?)
      Since I am not yet a power user, I don’t yet have need for some of the
      sophisticated aspects of the UI.
  7. Your blogs?

wo

May 17, 2007

Organizing an SF WoW/SHDH

Filed under: community, open source, women — anna @ 4:45 pm

There’s been a few threads on the SF WoW list about a local phenomenon- superhappydevhouse. It’s intriguing in that it’s so open door policy, and also attracts so many people. One member wrote in that she was going, another seeing if there was anyone who wanted to carpool (besides me). One other one wrote in for the organizers, asking if SF WoW knows why women aren’t attending SHDH.

Personally, after attending two, I’m not sure which is more significant or noteworthy, the youth of the crowd or the gender. I am noticing that it seems to get more diverse the longer it goes on- as my second time I saw more poeple over 30 and more women. The organizers at least seem interested in expanding the demographic.

The discussion on SF WoW seemed to focus more on whether the nature of the gathering was something more interesting to 20 something guys. Some folks pointed out that they didn’t have time or means to get down there, and that their projects were mostly done at work, not at home.

In the last year or so there’s been a couple of initial talks with organizers to do similar events up here- thanks to those volunteers that stepped up to organize it! Current, I’m working with two - thanks Sarah Mei & Angie Chang of women2.0!- to mobilize yet again. We’re encountering some hurdles- the feeling of our community and whether the list is truly interested, and of course whenever we have an event outside of SF we get a real dropoff in attendance. I believe we’re working on a “tester” event inside the city boundaries- hopefully up in Pac Heights- and we’ll see what the turnout and energy is like. SHDH down in the valley, at least the Los Gatos one I attended, had a really nice large house to sprawl around in. Venue is a huge challenge in SF! From various closeby cafes, to the New College, Women’s Building to private residences… not sure what will work! If you have suggestions please post below.

I’m also wondering if our cafe society really lends itself to a natural kind of collaborative, community approach. The only issue there, then, is the power usage and wi-fi. I’m betting that the limited bandwidth of cafe wi-fi will thwart the developers.

February 4, 2007

Through the Dot Com and Back

Filed under: List, technology, women — anna @ 8:47 pm

Scrappy at Metropol Lauren has this great idea, which is to start an SF WoW blog, and here I get to write the very first post! She asked me about the history of San Francisco Women on the Web (SF WoW- not to be confused with World of Warcraft) and how the group has changed since its beginning. Relevant topic now because it’s quite a lively debate on the list- those who remember it as a golden era of burgeoning technology, and those like me who have a love/hate relationship with that time.

We started before anybody would confuse us with World of Warcraft, for one. I remember the conversation where we came up with the name- Valerie Hoecke, who basically founded the group told us what the trademark lawyer had said about creating a name: it should be something specific to SF, and about the internet, something basically recognizeable, but still unique. Anyways, it was a huge improvement on the old name: SF WebGrrls. Growl- we’re nasty, hot, webmistressy girls! If you typed one wrong letter, that’s what you would get too. We got in a debate with the mothership in NYC (all of the nationwide WebGrrls did) about charging membership dues, and being for-profit. Valerie had the great idea of ceding and going for non-profit status. This was all in 1998. At that point, we’d had a few years of happy WebGrrl activities, and then we morphed into SF WoW.

The High Point

We were pretty much self-running at the point we transitioned, so I don’t remember, organizationally, any real shift. We had immensely successful programs: Top 25 Women on the Web was a 4-year running award ceremony, and PIMs (Platform Indepenedent Mixers) were as big as Pink Parties when they started. Along with that, there was a flip side. Flaky volunteers abounded, flamewars on the list, racial-political-etc. issues came up and swarmed around us. Cat discussions filled up your inbox… like kitty litter. We had a series of HTML workshops for teaching those that wanted to get into the next big thing: the internet (w00t!). Though most of us who started knew HTML already. I got in a great Perl study group that met every Monday at Bean There in Lower Haight, and we plowed through Randal Schwartz’s Learning Pearl. 30 peope RSVP’d to attend and only 5 made it. Flakiness abounded.

The Low Point

The Dot Com Bomb ripped our heart out, and the last thing we wanted to do was organize parties around the technology that ruined our bank account. Some things kept running in this period- PIMs, renamed Scrappies (scrappily organized), which is the photo above- myself and Ali Nufire in 2004, at Metropol. I remember one steering crew meeting when a director was leaving, and we offered to give her a bottle of wine as a parting gift. “Can you give me a Safeway coupon so I can buy groceries?” I can’t resist that story, as it’s a great anecdote, but not really … truthful. Sure, she said that, but then again, her and a few other list members were sad casualties of the pairing down and de-fluffing of tech companies (another post entirely). As one longterm SF Wowzer (that’s the thing you call someone in SF WoW, or just “Wowzer”) Andreas said, and he’s a guy, “There are always jobs for good people.” So sure, there was a huge falloff in jobs during 2001-3, but that doesn’t mean that the list floundered. More like, it quieted, focussed, and yet still managed to keep running.

Now

Two years ago, we decided to spend the existing assets of SF WoW on a series of parties. The idea was to invest capital in the group, to rejuvenate it or have at least a nice swan song. It ended up rejuvenating. Our Annual Party, on (or near) January 15th, 2005, we spent some cash on a nice restaurant, catering, and wine, and had one of the best event turnouts since Top 25. I heard, over and over that night, how people were glad ‘SF WoW is back’.

We also moved the list to Yahoo Groups and managed to survive Bush’s election. We had some very articulate, verbal pro-Bush supporters on the list so for about two years so the list became completely wrapped up in political turmoil. Our able volunteers managed to get the list over to Yahoo and prohibit political posts. Yep, that’s right. We agreed to disagree and just not talk about it! Even now, despite what goes on, people still chime in with “… and I’m so glad we got rid of politics” haha. Now the list is searchable- which is truly great. We have increased by 600 subscribers, from 1200 in the “low point”. I don’t actually know the numbers when we moved to SF WoW (someone please comment who knows) but it may have been in the 800s.

Not to be totally ingenuous- I recently posted on the list a long email about how bad I thought our discussions were getting “cats, nails, yoghurt”, and asked for members to re-examine why they were on a women’s networking and business list. Basically, to recommit to the mission. That has started some very interesting threads that I hope will carry over to this blog for those in the extended SF WoW community to read and contribute.

Powered by WordPress © San Francisco Women on the Web 1998-2007